facts about the Online Computer Library Center top 1000. It's a list of interesting (and sometimes bizarre!) facts about books that are found in most libraries. It's US-centric, but hey it's still interesting.">

Whimsical.nu

Welcome to a Whimsical Blog~

Hi, I'm Angela, a girl with a blog on five different psyches:
girl, geek, reader, writer, gamer
Choose your poison ♥

Sea Monsters and Austen, revisited

I'm talking about: Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters

So a while back I mentioned that I had gone and picked up Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, but never got around to actually talking about it. I suppose that, in itself, is pretty telling.

The adaptation’s delights present quite interestingly: a steampunk era mixed with dark and brooding elements: The Alteration has resulted in the emergence of aggressive sea-monsters of every kind, and London is transformed into Sub-Marine Station Beta, an underwater, massive iron-and-glass Dome that requires submarines to get to.

While your mileage may definitely vary, I found this adaptation falling rather flat, and trying too hard. It was clearly meant to be a steampunk adaptation–while I’m no steampunk expert, I felt it tried to inject the genre too harshly in the story, ending with an experience that felt quite jarring. I’m all for preposterousness (ahem!) but it didn’t gel as well as Pride and Prejudice and Zombies.

When I started feeling disappointed with the book, I quickly assessed myself if I was expecting too much from it, given that I thoroughly enjoyed Pride and Prejudice and Zombies; but the sad fact is, I wasn’t. Is it the harshness of poor Colonel Brandon’s facial tentacles? Too much foreboding horror in Margaret’s actions? Maybe I need to read more horror fiction to fully appreciate the humor in the story?

Most of my friends who have also read the book think the same, so I wonder if it’s really just bad writing. I’ve yet to hear of someone who liked the book. Maybe they can tell me if the last eighth of the book is worth it?

0 Comments

Emma (2009): A fresh, vivacious Emma

Emma DVD coverMost of my comfort movies/shows are adaptations of classics, and usually Austen ones. Recently, I’ve had the pleasure of watching BBC’s Emma (2009) miniseries, starring Romola Garai and Jonny Lee Miller, and while a relative newcomer, it has very quickly shot up my list of comfort movies.

To be frank (pun not intended), at the start I was feeling very ambivalent about Romola’s Emma. She was quite clearly spoiled, though in a relatively good-natured way. She was very expressive, and talkative. She flopped around the house and whined. At times, I actually felt like she was channeling Julia Sawalha‘s Lydia Bennet, almost flouncing on the seating. I felt like facepalming when she’d try to wheedle her way out of things. Lots of facepalming with the Harriet/Mr. Elton situations.

Emma and Lydia: No Caek

NO CAEK?!1!one!!

I was also not very sure about Jonny Lee Miller as Mr. Knightley. I’ve never really thought Jeremy Northam made a very good Mr. Knightley, but I didn’t think Jonny was, either. Where I’ve heard people say Jeremy was too handsome to be Mr. Knightley, I thought Jonny didn’t look authoritative enough to be Mr. Knightley: needed a bit more stature, presence, a sense of command. He was like a secondary-character brother.

Mr. Knightley - I told you so

I told you so!

But you know what? All that was amazingly perfect.

Unlikely actors, but amazing chemistry and acting

Emma is a spoiled child. She’s used to getting her way, and her natural wit only pushes that along. This Emma feels a lot more emphatic than the Emmas I’ve seen before (with the exception of Cher in Clueless, but then she isn’t “Emma” now, is she?), her emotions more on the surface, but that expressiveness pays off because she’s more “accessible”. You can see all her sincerity and earnestness even when she’s coming up with a laughable idea. And as the series progresses–you actually see her maturing right there, on the screen. Her movements seem to be more graceful, her expressions more moderate, though losing none of its earnestness and vivacity.

And Mr. Knightley? Well, he is an almost-secondary-character older-brother type of person. He never figures into Emma’s life as a primary character until much later: he’s always there, always around, but never in the spotlight. But even as someone in the wings, the miniseries didn’t forget him: the transition between older brother to possible lover so smooth. You see him talking in all seriousness, in his unaffected manner, that he thinks Emma is beautiful and that he loves to look at her–and then in almost the same breath talk about her flaws. Like a brother, a father. And then much later you see the looks last longer, the dawning realization, the jealousy of Frank that is there but doesn’t make him act ungraciously.

Frank Churchill - Complaining

Thwarted in everything, maybe even beer

I loved the marked, but not overdone, contrast between the young, impulsive Frank Churchill and the mature, earnest Mr. Knightley. Rupert Evans was a very believable Frank Churchill, who made us all think he really did like Emma, but whose actions later on pointed otherwise: and yet to do it with a lot of charm that you can’t help but forgive him. It doesn’t show Frank to a nice light, but I loved the scene where Frank just arrives at Donwell after encountering Jane Fairfax leaving: he is cranky, pessimistic, and looks to be quite thoroughly spoiled, but you feel the height of his distress at the words he had exchanged with Jane off-screen.

Emma and Jane

A tentative friendship

And Jane! I have to say, I loved Laura Pyper‘s Jane very much. I didn’t think so at first: I’ve always had an image of Jane in my mind that was a lot closer to Polly Walker‘s of the 1996 movie: stately, aloof, elegant. Inaccessible, except to admire from a distance. But Laura shows Jane’s feelings, her uncertainties, her fire: her firm, emphatic refusals of Mrs. Elton’s nosy ministrations, her joy at the ball, her morning walks. I loved the scene where Emma rescues Jane’s letters from Mrs. Elton’s prying, and the two share a smile: you can see how much the two could become friends, and feel a little sad that they don’t until the end.

Ending with the right note

I think however, that what completely sealed the deal for me was the ending: the pivotal moment when Everything Is Revealed. I loved how it kept much of the original dialogue, but it was very well executed that not only does it feel natural, you can really feel that these are two people who have known each other for a long time, agonizing, trying to find their way through.

Proposal scene

“You will not ask me my secret? Yes, you are wise; but I cannot be. So… I must tell you–”

“No, please don’t tell me! Take a little time to think of what you are going to say, for once said it cannot be unsaid!”

“…I will obey you.”

Emma’s expression, that agony, knowing she has hurt him with her outburst–you could almost hear her going “oh &^%$”, cursing herself roundly, wondering what in the hell she was doing, before turning back and running to him, telling him to wait.

You could hear his frustration, as he started to interrupt her that he doesn’t want to be just friends, his faraway look in the attempt to master his emotions.

These crucial moments, I feel, solidified the series for me. I’m a big fan of Pride and Prejudice and BBC’s 1995 production of it, but I think this adaptation trounced Darcy and Lizzy’s similar scene (which is probably not a very fair comparison: Darcy and Lizzy’s shining moments were mostly their verbal sparring, which is of a different quality as well).

I would really have loved to hear Mr. Knightley’s “You are silent, absolutely silent! At present I ask no more,” lines, but I suppose that never really translates very well on-screen.

(The same happened in Darcy and Lizzy’s final proposal scene: we never really hear what Lizzy said, exactly, but the BBC adaptation also supplied words. In both scenarios, it was done well; but whereas Austen said Lizzy “forced herself to speak…immediately, though not very fluently”, Emma was silent: a marked difference from her usual wit that shows how affected she is.)

As for Emma bursting into Donwell screaming that they could not marry, when I initially saw the trailer clips, I was quite shocked and dismayed, and quite ready to hate the series then. When that scene came, however, it did not jar as much as I expected. It made me cringe, but with the excellent proposal scene just moments before, it was forgivable.

The last scene with her father, and with Mr. Knightley, were both the right sort of tone to end the miniseries with. Simple and poignant, and all the more accessible to all of us, memorable and true.

And that’s what this adaptation was for me: slightly modernized in handling, but made more accessible; memorable and precious.

5 Comments

Sea Monsters and Austen

While at the bookstore over the weekend (a day at Orchard Road cannot be complete without going to Kinokuniya!), look at what I found!

Sense and Sensibility and Sea MonstersSense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters expands the original text of the beloved Jane Austen novel with all-new scenes of giant lobsters, rampaging octopi, two-headed sea serpents, and other biological monstrosities. As our story opens, the Dashwood sisters are evicted from their childhood home and sent to live on a mysterious island full of savage creatures and dark secrets. While sensible Elinor falls in love with Edward Ferrars, her romantic sister Marianne is courted by both the handsome Willoughby and the hideous man-monster Colonel Brandon. Can the Dashwood sisters triumph over meddlesome matriarchs and unscrupulous rogues to find true love? Or will they fall prey to the tentacles that are forever snapping at their heels? This masterful portrait of Regency England blends Jane Austen’s biting social commentary with ultraviolent depictions of sea monsters biting. It’s survival of the fittest—and only the swiftest swimmers will find true love!

Of course I couldn’t resist picking it up. I also found the deluxe edition of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies which boasts of 30% more zombie mayhem, so I certainly couldn’t pass that one up. I pre-ordered the first edition of the latter off of Amazon and it’s one of the best things I’ve ever ordered from Amazon, no doubts about it. I don’t think I’ve talked about P&P&Z here before (possibly only in my journal), but any Austen lover must have it. It’s so irreverent it’s hilarious! If this one is 50% as fun as P&P&Z, it’s bound to be a good read.

S&S isn’t my second-favorite Austen novel (that goes to Persuasion) but it’s also pretty close; and the Colonel as a sea monster? Oh too much to resist! I’m still debating whether I’m going to bring both or just S&S&SM (that’s a whole lotta Ss!) back to the Philippines while on holiday. Holidaying with sea monsters and zombies sounds quite fun. ;)

3 Comments

Maya Slater’s Mr. Darcy’s Diary

So I’m reading Maya Slater’s Mr. Darcy’s Diary, which I picked up at the Carrefour book sale I promised I wouldn’t go to. Like I said, I end up picking up books I wouldn’t normally buy at the usual price–like this one. I generally like retellings, but it seems to me that a lot of P&P retellings aren’t worth their salt (or pages).

I’m nearly chalking this one up as one of those you shouldn’t even bother borrowing. I haven’t given up on it yet, but I’m nearly there–and I’m not yet even half of the book. I’m skimming through the book, at the least. I’m not an expert of that time period by any means, so I’ve no idea how accurate some details and situations and habits are for that period–so don’t ask me about that. The characters are generally the same in terms of personality, and it seems to me that they included some dialogue from the 1995 BBC production with Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle, which is a plus for me: I loved that miniseries.

But I couldn’t care less about Darcy being… well, a man. At the risk of sounding like a prude, I didn’t care about the inclusion of Darcy’s intimate relations in the book; or of him having any with random people. Oh, they’re not “scandalous”; the first few instances, a friend had gotten him inebriated enough to spend an evening at a bordello; the ones after that were with a servant girl in Netherfield. If you can stretch your imagination, they even seem to be slightly according to Darcy’s personality, i.e., he wouldn’t have anything to do with the second girl while the Miss Bennets were in Netherfield due to Jane’s illness.

That is, if you can stretch your imagination far enough to imagine Darcy going to a bordello, or tumbling a serving girl in his friend’s house. “Darcy” does not write about the details of the encounter, thank goodness, but he does praise the first girl’s form along with mentioning, in passing, a word that feels “dirty”–although I’m not aware if it is a crude word. I’m just assuming it is, as there is a crude-word equivalent in modern vernacular.

It’s rather disturbing to think of Darcy tumbling random people, that’s all. Granted, he’s only done two in the time frame so far of the novel (and as he’s now rather in love with Lizzy, I assume there will be no more), but I’d much rather prefer that he had none whatsoever. Darcy is Darcy! You don’t have to have a man have intimate relations with serving girls et al to prove that he’s a man.

1 Comment

Booking Through Thursday: Other Worlds

Today’s Booking Through Thursday:

Are there any particular worlds in books where you’d like to live?

Or where you certainly would NOT want to live?

What about authors? If you were a character, who would you trust to write your life?

I’d always liked to live in either Narnia or Prydain. Those were the two fantasy worlds of my relative childhood, and they weigh roughly the same in my estimation. For Narnia particularly, I’m more interested in the first days, after the creation of Narnia, than the time of the Pevensies as kings and queens of the land. And for Prydain, certainly the time before the end of the series ;)

I would certainly not want to live in some of the worlds/places in Stephen King’s Dark Tower; End-World would be the worst *shudder*.

As for authors I’d trust to write about my life…that’s a tough one. I initially thought that I would trust all my favorite authors to write about myself but I realized that Jane Austen would find my horrible flaws and might give up on writing about me; Charlotte Bronte might turn off some readers with a long chapter about my feelings as a child; C.S. Lewis would turn everything into symbolism; Janet Fitch would add more grit and grime and un-beauty into my life than I’m prepared for!

I’m kidding, I would be honored if any of them would write about me; unfortunately, I have no idea who would be a good “fit”: one who have written something along the lines of my life, and the kind of style that I like.

2 Comments

Library books

I’d been meaning to put into words my thoughts on one article I saw on Digg a week or so back — on facts about the Online Computer Library Center top 1000. According to it,

[They] compiled a list of the top 1,000 titles owned by member libraries—the intellectual works judged to be the most worthy based on the “purchase vote” of libraries around the globe.

It’s an interesting list of interesting (and sometimes bizarre!) facts about books that are found in most libraries. It’s US-centric, but hey it’s still interesting. I suggest you read the article to get all the trivia, but the ones that were most interesting to me were:

  1. William Shakespeare had the most work in the top 1,000 with 37 works which isn’t surprising; John Grisham was third with 13 works; and Stephen King didn’t place at all. The Stephen King work to get nearest to the top thousand is The Gunslinger. (Which is the first King book I’ve read…and I’ve never read any other save the DT series.)
  2. Highest-ranking written work by women were Wuthering Heights (E. Brontë), Jane Eyre (C. Brontë), and Pride and Prejudice (J. Austen). They are separated from each other by exactly one gap each (at 28, 30, and 32, respectively). I didn’t like the first, but the other two are my top two books of all time.
  3. Jesus is the most written-about person in the World Category (I assume that’s what they mean by “WorldCat”; correct me if I’m wrong).
  4. Comics in the library! Garfield is 15th.

It makes me wonder, really, how Philippine libraries would fare. I’ve never been to a library (that I could call a library) in a long time.

2 Comments